Paper  |   December 2006
Recognition of Simulated Telephone Speech by Cochlear Implant Users
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Qian-Jie Fu
    House Ear Institute, Los Angeles
  • John J. Galvin, III
    House Ear Institute, Los Angeles
  • Contact author: Qian-Jie Fu, Department of Auditory Implants and Perception, House Ear Institute, 2100 West Third Street, Los Angeles, CA 90057. E-mail: qfu@hei.org.
Hearing Aids, Cochlear Implants & Assistive Technology / Speech, Voice & Prosody
Paper   |   December 2006
Recognition of Simulated Telephone Speech by Cochlear Implant Users
American Journal of Audiology December 2006, Vol.15, 127-132. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2006/016)
History: Accepted 03 Oct 2006 , Received 25 Apr 2006 , Revised 10 Aug 2006
American Journal of Audiology December 2006, Vol.15, 127-132. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2006/016)
History: Accepted 03 Oct 2006 , Received 25 Apr 2006 , Revised 10 Aug 2006

Purpose: To evaluate cochlear implant users’ understanding of telephone speech.

Method: Telephone speech was simulated by band-limiting broadband speech stimuli. Multitalker vowel, consonant, and sentence recognition was measured for both simulated telephone speech and broadband speech in 10 postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant users. The study was approved by the St. Vincent’s Hospital institutional review board, and signed, informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Results: There was no significant difference in vowel recognition scores between broadband and telephone speech. However, mean consonant and sentence recognition scores were significantly poorer with telephone speech.

Conclusions: The limited telephone bandwidth significantly reduced cochlear implant users’ understanding of telephone speech. The effect of band-limited speech was highly variable, suggesting that the contribution of high-frequency information to speech recognition varied significantly among the cochlear implant users.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire American Journal of Audiology content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access

Related Articles

Erratum
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research December 2010, Vol.53, 1775. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/er1110b)
Vowel and Diphthong Production by Young Users of Cochlear Implants and the Relationship Between the Phonetic Level Evaluation and Spontaneous Speech
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research June 1993, Vol.36, 488-502. doi:10.1044/jshr.3603.488
Speech Production Accuracy and Variability in Young Cochlear Implant Recipients: Comparisons With Typically Developing Age-Peers
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research February 2011, Vol.54, 177-189. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0165)
Beginning to Talk Like an Adult: Increases in Speech-Like Utterances in Young Cochlear Implant Recipients and Typically Developing Children
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology November 2013, Vol.22, 591-603. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0058)
Erratum
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research August 2013, Vol.56, 1347. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2013/er-0620)