Reply I am afraid that there has been a misunderstanding of the statement “Accusations were very often emotional, and anonymous communication more than once threatened impending censor-ship—that never materialized—from ASHA, MSHA, and our licensing board….” I did not mean to imply that ASHA, MSHA, or the licensing board themselves had made ... Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor  |   July 01, 1994
Reply
 
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Aaron Thornton
    Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Boston, MA
Article Information
Professional Issues & Training / ASHA News & Member Stories / Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor   |   July 01, 1994
Reply
American Journal of Audiology, July 1994, Vol. 3, 79. doi:10.1044/1059-0889.0302.79a
 
American Journal of Audiology, July 1994, Vol. 3, 79. doi:10.1044/1059-0889.0302.79a
I am afraid that there has been a misunderstanding of the statement “Accusations were very often emotional, and anonymous communication more than once threatened impending censor-ship—that never materialized—from ASHA, MSHA, and our licensing board….” I did not mean to imply that ASHA, MSHA, or the licensing board themselves had made any accusations or threats. I said only that the “anonymous communication” contained threats that ASHA, MSHA, or the licensing board would act to curtail our use of technicians. If I had known who sent the letters or made the calls, I wouldn’t have characterized them as anonymous. Although I believe that the wording of the tortuous sentence is technically correct, I can understand how it might have been misinterpreted.
First Page Preview
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview ×
View Large
Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire American Journal of Audiology content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access