Research Article  |   November 1994
Compression Amplification in Hearing Aids
Hearing Aids, Cochlear Implants & Assistive Technology
Research Article   |   November 1994
Compression Amplification in Hearing Aids
American Journal of Audiology November 1994, Vol.3, 51-65. doi:10.1044/1059-0889.0303.51
History: Accepted 21 Dec 1993 , Received 22 Aug 1993
American Journal of Audiology November 1994, Vol.3, 51-65. doi:10.1044/1059-0889.0303.51
History: Accepted 21 Dec 1993 , Received 22 Aug 1993

In this tutorial, the characteristics of compression amplification in analog hearing aids and the experimental results obtained with single- and multichannel compression amplification systems are reviewed. Single-channel compression systems are classified into four broad groups on the basis of their static and dynamic characteristics: compression limiters, syllabic compressors, automatic volume control (AVC) systems, and "others," those with adaptive recovery time (aRT) and dual frontend automatic gain control (AGC) (Moore, 1990; Moore & Glasberg, 1988). Multichannel compression devices have, to date, used a variety of different types of compression, with syllabic compression in each frequency channel being the most popular. Experimental evidence suggests that compression limiting is generally superior to peak clipping as a means of controlling output, except for some individuals with severe to profound hearing loss. There is some evidence that syllabic compression and AVC systems enhance speech perception in quiet compared to conventional linear amplification; however, this improvement is not consistently maintained in the presence of background noise. The majority of recent research has focused on multichannel compression, and favorable results have been obtained with some systems. Research findings about the efficacy of using compression amplification for people with hearing loss have been extremely variable, and possible reasons for this are discussed.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire American Journal of Audiology content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access

Related Articles

Temporal Resolution With a Prescriptive Fitting Formula
American Journal of Audiology December 2013, Vol.22, 216-225. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2013/13-0001)
Effect of Digital Frequency Compression (DFC) on Speech Recognition in Candidates for Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation (EAS)
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research October 2007, Vol.50, 1194-1202. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/083)
An Evidence-Based Systematic Review of Amplitude Compression in Hearing Aids for School-Age Children With Hearing Loss
American Journal of Audiology December 2012, Vol.21, 269-294. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2012/12-0013)
An Evidence-Based Systematic Review of Frequency Lowering in Hearing Aids for School-Age Children With Hearing Loss
American Journal of Audiology December 2012, Vol.21, 313-328. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2012/12-0015)
Coordinator’s Column
SIG 7 Perspectives on Aural Rehabilitation and Its Instrumentation January 2013, Vol.20, 3. doi:10.1044/arii20.1.3