Article  |   December 2005
The Importance of Modality Specificity in Diagnosing Central Auditory Processing Disorder
Author Notes
Hearing Disorders
Article   |   December 2005
The Importance of Modality Specificity in Diagnosing Central Auditory Processing Disorder
American Journal of Audiology December 2005, Vol.14, 112-123. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2005/012)
History: Accepted 10 Jun 2005 , Received 08 Feb 2005
American Journal of Audiology December 2005, Vol.14, 112-123. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2005/012)
History: Accepted 10 Jun 2005 , Received 08 Feb 2005

Purpose: This article argues for the use of modality specificity as a unifying framework by which to conceptualize and diagnose central auditory processing disorder (CAPD). The intent is to generate dialogue and critical discussion in this area of study.

Method: Research in the cognitive, behavioral, and neural sciences that relates to the concept of modality specificity was reviewed and synthesized.

Results: Modality specificity has a long history as an organizing construct within a diverse collection of mainstream scientific disciplines. The principle of modality specificity was contrasted with the unimodal inclusive framework, which holds that auditory tests alone are sufficient to make the CAPD diagnosis. Evidence from a large body of data demonstrated that the unimodal framework was unable to delineate modality-specific processes from more generalized dysfunction; it lacked discriminant validity and resulted in an incomplete assessment. Consequently, any hypothetical model resulting from incomplete assessments or potential therapies that are based on indeterminate diagnoses are themselves questionable, and caution should be used in their application.

Conclusions: Improving specificity of diagnosis is an imperative core issue to the area of CAPD. Without specificity, the concept has little explanatory power. Because of serious flaws in concept and design, the unimodal inclusive framework should be abandoned in favor of a more valid approach that uses modality specificity.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire American Journal of Audiology content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access

Related Articles

Modality Specificity as a Criterion for Diagnosing Central Auditory Processing Disorders
American Journal of Audiology November 1995, Vol.4, 36-48. doi:10.1044/1059-0889.0403.36
Using Different Criteria to Diagnose (Central) Auditory Processing Disorder: How Big a Difference Does It Make?
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research February 2013, Vol.56, 63-70. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0352)
Seeking a Valid Gold Standard for an Innovative, Dialect-Neutral Language Test
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research March 2014, Vol., 1-14. doi:10.1044/2013_JSLHR-L-12-0126
The Diagnostic Accuracy of Two Tense Measures for Identifying 3-Year-Olds With Language Impairment
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology February 2014, Vol., 1-10. doi:10.1044/2013_AJSLP-13-0007
Inbox: Misleading CAPD Advice
The ASHA Leader February 2014, Vol.19, 4. doi:10.1044/leader.IN1.19022014.4