Amplification Is Class D Better Than Class B? Face-to-Face
Face-to-Face  |   March 01, 1994
Amplification
 
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • William A. Johnson
    Threepenny Electronics Corp., 1042 SE 19th Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55414-2553
  • Mead C. Killion, PhD
    Etymotic Research, 61 Martin Lane, Elk Grove Village, IL 60007
Article Information
Hearing Aids, Cochlear Implants & Assistive Technology / Face-to-Face
Face-to-Face   |   March 01, 1994
Amplification
American Journal of Audiology, March 1994, Vol. 3, 11-13. doi:10.1044/1059-0889.0301.11
 
American Journal of Audiology, March 1994, Vol. 3, 11-13. doi:10.1044/1059-0889.0301.11
Johnson
Killion
Johnson: I’ll tell you how bad it is! Every time I turn around I hear someone saying something silly about the class D amplifier. I don’t know whether I am encountering naïveté or dishonesty, but it seems ubiquitous.
I don’t mean to disparage the class D amplifier. I think it is a fine idea—and well carried out. But sometimes the copy makes it sound like it is a breakthrough of acoustical significance. Nonsense!
First Page Preview
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview ×
View Large
Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire American Journal of Audiology content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access