Research Article  |   December 2011
Early Hearing Detection and Intervention: Diagnostic Hearing Assessment Practices
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Karen Muñoz
    National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management, Utah State University, Logan
    Utah State University, Logan
  • Lauri Nelson
    Utah State University, Logan
  • Natalie Goldgewicht
    Utah State University, Logan
  • Dennis Odell
    Center for Persons with Disabilities, Utah State University, Logan
  • Correspondence to Karen Muñoz: karen.munoz@usu.edu
  • Editor: Sheila Pratt
    Editor: Sheila Pratt×
  • Associate Editor: Lenore Holt
    Associate Editor: Lenore Holt×
Hearing Disorders / Special Populations / Early Identification & Intervention / Research Article
Research Article   |   December 2011
Early Hearing Detection and Intervention: Diagnostic Hearing Assessment Practices
American Journal of Audiology December 2011, Vol.20, 123-131. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0046)
History: Accepted 18 May 2011 , Received 25 Oct 2010
American Journal of Audiology December 2011, Vol.20, 123-131. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0046)
History: Accepted 18 May 2011 , Received 25 Oct 2010

Purpose: To gain an understanding of practice patterns for infant diagnostic hearing services at pediatric audiology facilities.

Method: The authors used a cross-sectional survey design. From August to November of 2009, surveys were mailed to 1,091 facilities in 28 states and the District of Columbia. One survey was completed per facility, and responses were anonymous.

Results: The return rate was 33% (356 surveys). The results revealed that the comprehensiveness of the test batteries used varied among facilities. Over half of the respondents, 146 (55%), reported using a limited test battery, 94 facilities reported using a comprehensive test battery but lacked at least 1 component recommended by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, and 25 facilities reported using a test battery that met Joint Committee on Infant Hearing recommendations. The wait time for an appointment varied between facilities (range = 3 days–5 months) and was affected by the test condition (i.e., natural sleep, sedation, or operating room).

Conclusions: The results suggest that it is difficult for stakeholders to identify pediatric audiology facilities that serve infants less than 6 months of age and that there is variability among facilities in test batteries and wait times for an appointment. Implications exist for diagnostic accuracy and timeliness of diagnosis.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire American Journal of Audiology content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access

Related Articles

Response to Sauter (2007)
American Journal of Audiology June 2007, Vol.16, 77-78. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2007/008)
Early Hearing Detection and Intervention: Parent Experiences With the Diagnostic Hearing Assessment
American Journal of Audiology June 2012, Vol.21, 91-99. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2012/11-0016)
Initial Audiologic Assessment of Infants Referred From Well Baby, Special Care, and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Nurseries
American Journal of Audiology June 2006, Vol.15, 14-24. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2006/003)
Neural Networks Applied to Retrocochlear Diagnosis
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research April 1999, Vol.42, 287-299. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4202.287
Survey of the Diagnosis and Management of Auditory Processing Disorder
American Journal of Audiology June 2011, Vol.20, 48-60. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0019)